I dont even think you read my post or if you do you have some kind of automatic off switch in your head complete with and auto response mechanism because really all ive seen from you are just very strong biased opinions with dashes of slamming. Much of which is regurgitated crap.
"Do you know how long we've had military bases in other countries Cruizer?"
yeah, and? your point?
NM, ill attempt to make one for u.
Conquest as in spreading our bases to even more to places where there not even wanted in order to further push our elitiest views and opinions on the world WOOT!! Again there may be a broader agenda at hand. Maybe im using the word inappropriately, im not perfect but i thought it was fair to use in that context. If you have bases in a country, are pulling the strings of the government and your general presence dictates what happens in the region couldnt that be considered conquered in a way? I hadnt thought about it like that till you made me consider my words more carefully.
So if i read your words then id have to guess you think these bases are strategic in protecting our interest around the world right?
So tell me Hylander, what in Iraq was/is ours to protect when we decided to build these bases that will be there for DECADES? Since were only there in the interest of Iraqi's and all why are they needed>?
Id like to hear this. Will you discuss this or just slam me again?
Tell me exactly where im being incoherent and ill be glad to try and clarify. Granted im not the most eloquent dood on the block and i dont claim to have a perfect train of thought at all times either.
Ill try to be more thoughtful in my post knowing that ill be labeled, directed and scrutinized more then just talked to.